 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Johns v. A.T. Stephens Enters., 1991710,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants properly invoked the trial court's authority to hold a hearing on their motion, asking the trial court to hold a hearing to review the punitive-damages award, alleging the amount was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Keevan v. Keevan, 2000102,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not retain jurisdiction beyond 30 days after final divorce judgment was entered to modify the property provisions of a divorce judgment, and thus, it committed reversible error in modifying a provision 14 years after the judgment.
|
|||||
| Morris v. Laster, 1990386, 1990401,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was reversible error for the trial court to publish, over the objection of the defendant pest control company, to the jury the details of the settlement between the homeowners and various other defendants.
|
|||||
| Premiere Auto. Group, Inc. v. Welch, 1000321, 1000431,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As trial court had before it conflicting evidence as to execution of certain agreements between parties, the appropriate method of resolving the conflict was a jury trial limited to issue of whether plaintiff entered an arbitration agreement.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Akzo Nobel Indus. Fibers, Inc., 2991313,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly held the testimony had not produced in the mind of the trier of fact a firm conviction that the worker suffered from carpal tunnel syndrome.
|
|||||
| Warren v. Wester, 2991058,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because record did not reflect that summary judgment disposed of all claims as to all parties to case, court concluded that summary judgment was not final and dismissed common law wife's appeal of summary judgment to deceased's coemployees.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. H.M.A., L.L.C., 2991400, 2000074,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 6, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where very few commercial structures could be built on real property zoned for commercial use due to zoning setbacks, $ 45,000 was "reasonably fair price" that was not "so disproportionate" price as to shock one's conscience.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
