 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sullens v. State, CR-01-0968,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 21, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indictments were not defective for failing to allege culpable mental state since criminal statute under which defendants were charged did not specifically exclude any mental state, and indictments sufficiently apprised defendants of nature of charges.
|
|||||
| Thornton v. State, CR-01-2215 and CR-01-2145,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 21, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's appeal from the denial of his petitions challenging his brothers' convictions for rape and sodomy was dismissed, as the petitions were not properly verified and, thus, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the petitions.
|
|||||
| Triplett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2011287,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 21, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In employee's action seeking workers' compensation benefits, appellate court held that a notice of appeal which the employee filed was untimely because it was filed more than 42 days after trial court granted employer's motion for summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CR-01-1775,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 21, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a report to the trial court from mental health agency expressed serious doubts about defendant's ability to comprehend a guilty plea, trial court should have held competency hearing before denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
