 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alabama Historical Comm'n v. City of Birmingham, 2981337,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City's mortgage was executed and recorded before commission's easement arose, and commission did not redeem easement, so foreclosure of the first mortgage, which resulted in city's redemption deed, extinguished the easement.
|
|||||
| Carrell v. Masonite Corp., 1981292,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A continuance should have been granted to buyers whose claims for fraudulent suppression against sellers needed further discovery prior to a summary judgment ruling.
|
|||||
| Celtic Life Ins. Co. v. Lindsey, 1972120, 1972121, 1972188, 1972189,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's motion to compel arbitration after rejecting insureds' claim was improperly denied, as return of premium by insurer and breach of contract claim by insureds suggested there was no mutual assent to rescind contract.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Cater, 1980615,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting a nonexclusive, private easement for ingress and egress over property when defendant failed to satisfy her burden of proving the necessity for the easement.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Earthgrains, Inc., 1982200,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Freeman, 1981565,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Death sentence was proper; it was not imposed under influence of passion or prejudice; aggravating and mitigating circumstances indicated that sentence was proper; sentence was not excessive in comparison to similar cases.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Garner, 1981307,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The term of appellant's sentence that was ordered to be served consecutively was reversed, finding that it was the trial court's decision to allow sentences imposed for separate offenses to run concurrently.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Hyde, 1971109,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the court found no error, plain or otherwise, in either the guilt phase or the penalty phase of defendant's trial that would have warranted reversal, it affirmed defendant's conviction and the sentence of death.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Pardue, 1980254,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a statute required that three full days pass between the date defendant gave notice of intention to plead guilty and the date the district court took the plea, it was error to accept defendant's plea on the third day.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
