 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A.D. v. State, CR-99-0309,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of juvenile's "aftercare" status following delinquency disposition and sentence to 12 months in custody of youth services agency were remanded for written statement of reasons and evidence relied upon.
|
|||||
| Arrington v. State, CR-99-0795,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial could continue without appellant because he voluntarily chose not to return for the trial. Thus, he waived his right to be present for the remainder of the trial, but he did not waive his right to jury trial; thus, case was remanded.
|
|||||
| Avery v. State, CR-98-1237,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's challenge regarding voluntariness of his plea was remanded where the trial court failed to make findings regarding the amount of sentence and waiver of constitutional protections for entry of a guilty plea.
|
|||||
| Battle v. Alpha Chem. & Paper Co., 2990450,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff did not intentionally fail to list claim against defendant on schedule of assets in bankruptcy, and defendant did not demonstrate prejudice, plaintiff's claim was not barred by judicial estoppel.
|
|||||
| Blake v. State, CR-99-0049,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seizure of marijuana and cocaine was the result of a valid warrantless search because officers had probable cause to search appellant's vehicle and probable cause to seize cocaine from appellant arose during a permissible protective patdown search.
|
|||||
| Brakefield v. Hocutt, 1982009,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee's elective share was miscalculated where court failed to first deduct other allowable claims against estate; family allowance was not an abuse of discretion where appellee had substantial expenses as well as independent income.
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, CR-98-2514,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence appeared illegal where appellant was not present to assist the trial court in determining the number of prior felony convictions with which to enhance his sentence as a habitual offender.
|
|||||
| Burns v. State, CR-99-0643,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court could not determine whether appellant was properly informed of the correct range of punishment before he pleaded guilty; thus, it could not have determined whether his guilty plea was voluntary; thus, case was remanded.
|
|||||
| Bush v. Balams, CR-97-1094,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
