 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hobart Corp. v. Scoggins, 1980195,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Compensatory damages were proper for meat cutter who cut off his finger while using manufacturer's meat cutting saw, as he showed wantonness. Punitive damages were reversed as meat cutter failed to show manufacturer's knowledge of danger.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR-99-0778,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claims of ineffective assistance as to appellate counsel were precluded, but claims as to trial counsel were not. Postconviction proceeding was appellant's first opportunity to raise claim as to trial counsel's performance.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR-99-0901,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was without authority to consider petitioner's habeas corpus relief petition because it was not the court where underlying conviction occurred; thus, the cause had to be transferred to the court where the conviction was entered.
|
|||||
| Lane v. State, CR-99-0779,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was sufficiently detailed to meet the burden of proof for such a claim, the trial court erred in summarily dismissing appellant's claim.
|
|||||
| Leeth v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 2981435,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Living v. State, CR-98-1326,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: One of two convictions for capital murder was vacated, but remaining conviction affirmed; evidence did not support instruction on heat-of-passion manslaughter, appellant's statements were voluntary, and change of venue was not required.
|
|||||
| Macewan v. State, CR-99-0463,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Matthews v. Alabama Agric. & Mech. Univ., 1981259,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When student sued university and officials, summary judgment was properly granted to university because it made a showing of immunity; summary judgment for officials was improper because they failed to make a prima facie case of immunity.
|
|||||
| Maxwell v. State, CR-97-2150,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Capital murder convictions and death sentence affirmed. Defendant's confession was voluntary. Sufficient evidence supported convictions. Imperfect Allen charge did not demand reversal. If nonresponsive, witness's answer was not prejudicial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
