 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hardnett, 1982141,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's summary judgment based on uninsured auto coverage against defendant insurer was reversed, because policy language was clear and unambiguous that plaintiff's vehicle was not "uninsured auto" under the policy.
|
|||||
| C.Y.M. v. P.E.K., 2981263,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Dothan Personnel Bd. v. Harrison, 2970572,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Etherton, 1981962,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's request for writ of mandamus was denied because there was another remedy available in having trial court review, in camera, privileged records to determine whether anything in the records was discoverable.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Galanos, 1971499,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judge's petition was granted and appellate court was instructed to vacate judgment granting writ of mandamus, as respondent had other adequate available remedy to challenge indigent-defense system and attorney fees reduction.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Green Tree Acceptance, Inc., 1972259,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was denied writ of mandamus to dismiss or stay plaintiffs' individual action pending resolution of class action on similar claims, as only class-action court had authority to make that decision.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Harold L. Martin Distrib. Co., 1981921,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Identification of defects and noncompliance with construction standards by itself did not establish or raise presumption that fall was in fact caused by store owner's negligent construction of ramp, curb, and sidewalk.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Jefferson County, 1982281,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' class action alleging a tax violated Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; plaintiffs properly served copy of complaint on state attorney general.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Saunders, 1990445,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
