LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - April 18, 2008

  
Broadnax v. Griswold, 2061190, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: It was proper to rule for a driver in an owner's action alleging that the driver negligently damaged her automobile because the owner's insurer was the real party in interest under Ala. R. Civ. P. 17(a). Because the insurer paid the owner to compensate her for the damage, the owner's right to recover from the driver was transferred to the insurer.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chris Myers Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. Perot, 1061090, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court erred in denying a seller's motion to compel arbitration of purchasers' claims because the seller did not waive its right to require the purchasers to arbitrate their claims by failing to start the arbitration process. Under the parties' arbitration agreement, the aggrieved party had the burden of initiating the arbitration process.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
D.L.L. v. B.J., 2061156, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A father's appeal of a juvenile court judgment awarding maternal grandparents custody of his child was dismissed because the notice of appeal was untimely. The father failed to file the notice of appeal within 14 days of the denial of his postjudgment motion pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 52, 55, or 59.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Nationwide Ins. Co., 1061708, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A writ of mandamus directed a trial court to dismiss an insured's claim for UIM benefits because her amendment to substitute her insurer for a fictitiously named defendant did not relate back to her complaint under Ala. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(4). She did not exercise due diligence in ascertaining the insurer's identity before the limitations period ran.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Novartis Pharms. Corp., 1070310, 1070311, 1070312, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Pharmaceutical manufacturers' petitions for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order consolidating civil fraud cases under Ala. R. Civ. P. 42 were denied because a common question of law or fact formed the premise for consolidating the cases. The State alleged claims of fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent suppression against each manufacturer.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Holmes v. City of Birmingham, 2070068, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Circuit court did not err in vacating a county personnel board's order upholding a city's decision to terminate an employee on the ground that the board failed to timely issue its order in compliance with the 30-day time limit provision in its rules because the rules did not conflict with 1945 Ala. Acts 248, § 22, as amended by 1977 Ala. Acts 684.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
M.S. v. D.A.P., 2060984, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pipeline Technic, L.L.C. v. Mason, 2060657, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in awarding an employee workers' compensation benefits for an injury to the body as a whole, not for an injury to a scheduled member under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, Ala. Code § 25-5-57(a)(3), Medical evidence did not contradict the employee's testimony that his gait, altered by his foot injury, caused back pain.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Roberts v. Univ. of Ala. Hosp., 2070256, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly declared that a hospital was entitled to liens under Ala. Code § 35-11-370 as to unpaid charges for services provided to patients. Its finding was based on evidence that the patients were billed for medically necessary services and that the unenhanced charges for those services were determined by reference to a pricing list.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Swafford v. Norton, 2060722, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 18, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: It was proper to grant an estate summary judgment in an alleged son's action seeking a declaration that a decedent was his father because he lacked standing to bring the action Because the son was born during his mother's marriage to her husband, he had a presumed father under the Alabama Uniform Parentage Act, Ala. Code, § 26-17-5(a)(1).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.