 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Swan v. City of Hueytown, 1031058,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 15, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a police officer and a dispatcher were arresting or attempting to arrest an arrestee by determining if he had any outstanding warrants, they were entitled to state-agent immunity under Ala. Code § 6-5-338; consequently, because the city's immunity was derivative, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the officer and the city.
|
|||||
| Watson v. Watson, 1031675,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 15, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While denial of customer's motion for temporary restraining order was interlocutory order appealable pursuant to Ala. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), customer's appeal was dismissed because he appealed from the trial court's action setting a hearing on customer's request for preliminary injunction, and such an action was not appealable interlocutory order.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Williams, 2030983,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 15, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since defendant son was a nonresident when personal service was attempted, and there was no evidence that he knew that he would be sued when he moved to Tennessee, later efforts to serve him by publication did not confer in personam jurisdiction, a default judgment was void, and the trial court erred in denying the son's motion for relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
