 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. Neil, 1080092,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 17, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alleged business purchaser could not pursue claims, including tortious interference with contract and fraud, on behalf of the business against defendants, a purchaser, an attorney, and an employee of the business, as the asserted sale was never consummated; thus, the alleged purchaser lacked standing.
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. City of Satsuma, 2071042,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 17, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment dismissing a former city employee's workers' compensation claim complied with Ala. Code ¿ 25-5-88 because its prior order, which was made final by the judgment, set forth extensive factual findings reached after the trial court viewed surveillance video tapes of the employee.
|
|||||
| T. B. v. T.H., 2071009,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 17, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Once a juvenile court decided that a case would not be decided on dependency principles, under Ala. Code ¿ 12-15-30(b)(1) it had no jurisdictional basis for determining custody of a child, and its judgment awarding custody to the child's maternal grandparents was void.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
