 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Robinson v. Boohaker, Schillaci & Co., P.C., 1972152,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In pari delicto was available as affirmative defense in employment contract case between plaintiff accountant and defendant firm; equitable estoppel could not be asserted defensively with both parties in equal fault.
|
|||||
| Sanders v. Shoe Show, Inc., 2981431,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment properly granted, as there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether anyone was restrained; no state action took place in altercation, and there was no intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Scheinert v. Southern Rubber Co., 2990175,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's action should have been brought by his bankruptcy trustee. Because plaintiff lacked standing to appeal, the court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction, so the appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Tallassee Super Foods v. Hepburn, 2981410,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment reversed because there was no evidence to support finding that appellee suffered injury in a specific event and the trial court applied the wrong standard to determine entitlement to workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Johnson, 2990289,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant proved that he lacked present ability to purge himself of contempt, his continued confinement could not coerce his compliance with trial court's order to pay child support.
|
|||||
| Tolin v. Department of Indus. Rels., 2980673,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's finding that claimant had voluntarily quit her job and that she was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation was not contrary to the great weight of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Domingo, 2981466,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact on whether plaintiff's injury was caused by accident or repetitive stress in workers' compensation case, because the scenarios had differing tests, burdens of proof.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
