 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Golden v. Golden, 2990374,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mailing a payment on an obligation incurred in another state was not conduct from which a party would reasonably expect to be haled into a foreign court and thus did not constitute minimum contacts with the foreign jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Holloway v. State ex rel. Whetstone, 2990353,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the record showed appellant was not charged, and his car was returned to him because police found that neither it nor currency seized in it were involved in a drug transaction, the trial court erred in holding that the money be forfeited.
|
|||||
| Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Denson, 1981364, 1981365,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because no regulations required train to have air conditioning and no evidence showed railway had duty to instruct employees to go to vestibule for impending collision, judgment for employees in personal injury action reversed.
|
|||||
| Sealy v. D'Amico, 2990355,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Incarceration for civil contempt for an ex-husband's failure to comply with divorce judgment orders regarding payment of money was permitted, but payment of a sanction was not, where the record showed he had money and did not intend to pay.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
