Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Alabama - April 22, 2005
  
Campbell v. Campbell, 2030437, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Given a husband's timely Ala. R. Civ. P. 60(b), because the trial court failed to consider whether (1) he had a meritorious defense; (2) the wife would be unfairly prejudiced if the default judgment was set aside; and (3) the default judgment was a result of the husband's own culpable conduct, the matter was remanded for consideration of the same.

Search Cases for Free
  
Ex parte Egbuonu, 1040647, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Ex parte Mullins, 1040239, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the trial court had thrice recognized that defendant had reserved his right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion, it erred in finding otherwise. Moreover, the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in dismissing his appeal from said order, requiring remand to that court to consider the merits of defendant's appeal.

Search Cases for Free
  
Fowler v. CEC Entm't, 2040181, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because an injured party failed to show that her fall resulted from a defective step on a restaurant's premises, that resulted from its negligence of which it had or should have had notice, she failed to prove the restaurant's liability. Further, because the step did not exist when the lease on the premises was signed, the lessor was not liable.

Search Cases for Free
  
Gunter v. Gunter, 2030709, 2030756, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a daughter had an interest in personal property subject to distribution in a divorce proceeding, the trial court erred in denying her father's motion to allow her intervention and appoint her a guardian ad litem. Further, given newly discovered evidence of a wife's perjury, adultery, and sale of drugs, the husband was entitled to a hearing.

Search Cases for Free
  
Marks v. Tenbrunsel, 1031515, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 22, 2005, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Patient's suit against a psychologist arising out of the psychologist's report of child abuse admitted by the patient was properly dismissed as the psychologist was permitted to report the abuse under Ala. Code ??26-14-4 and the psychologist was immune from liability for breach of a promise of confidentiality under Ala. Code ??26-14-9.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.