Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Alabama - March 26, 2004

  
Jackson v. State, CR-02-1998, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the jury instructions amended an indictment by reconciling the variance between the allegations in the original indictment with the evidence presented at trial, the amendment did not run afoul of the procedural rules.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kinchlow v. State, CR-02-2284, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a trial court's order did not reflect the evidence relied upon or the reason or reasons it had for revoking defendant's probation, the matter had to be remanded for entry of a new order.

Search Cases for Free

  
Lanham v. State, CR-02-1579, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a videotape defendant possessed contained both nude adults and children, but focused on the children's nudity, appealed to the sexual urges of voyeurs and pedophiles, and lacked any literary and artistic merit, it was obscene.

Search Cases for Free

  
Miles v. Foust, 2020849, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Sellers were not required to serve response to buyer's summary judgment motion at any particular time. Trial court erred in refusing to consider merits of motion and in failing to grant sellers hearing on their claims that motion was insufficient.

Search Cases for Free

  
Morris v. Padgett, 2021028, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Although divorce judgment suspended father's child support obligation on grounds that parties had children for equal amount of time, it awarded custody to mother. Thus, father had to argue modification standard in order to obtain custody.

Search Cases for Free

  
Patterson v. State, CR-03-0435, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of inmate's habeas petition alleging denial of due process was reversed as hearing officer who presided over the disciplinary hearing was also involved in the investigation of the charges, which resulted in admission of guilt by inmate.

Search Cases for Free

  
Russell v. State, CR-02-1738, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Case was remanded to trial court to determine whether defendant was properly notified of right to seek youthful-offender status, as defendant was 19 years old when offenses were committed and was eligible to request youthful-offender treatment.

Search Cases for Free

  
Saffo v. State, CR-03-0149, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the State did not refute defendant's allegation that the trial court never informed him of his right to appeal a murder conviction and sentence, the matter had to be remanded to address the merits of defendant's claim.

Search Cases for Free

  
Simmons v. State, CR-02-1630, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in summarily dismissing postconviction relief petition from petitioner's capital murder conviction and death sentence; state supreme court's clarification of amended time limit made it clear he timely filed his petition.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Abner, CR-02-2190, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 26, 2004, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant, passenger in vehicle that was stopped, was asked to get out of car after he became extremely nervous when officer asked for his driver's license, this did not constitute unreasonable seizure; officer reasonably feared for his safety.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top