 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sherman v. Henry Marine Serv., 2050643,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as employer had no legal duty to obtain additional Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act insurance for benefit of employee, regardless of language of endorsement, since employer fit broad description of alternate employer contained in schedule in endorsement.
|
|||||
| State DOT v. Sanford, 2060219,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in ordering the Alabama State Department of Transportation to issue a landowner a permit to erect an advertising sign on the disputed property, because the judgment violated Ala. Code § 23-1-274(3) in that it required issuance of permits for outdoor advertising signs within 500 feet of one another on the same side of a highway.
|
|||||
| State v. Moore, CR-06-0747,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Considering totality of circumstances presented, including the State and trial court's animosity towards each other and the fact that the trial court had ruled on several pieces of evidence, State met its burden of showing that there was an appearance of impropriety in trial court remaining on respondent's case during his capital-murder retrial.
|
|||||
| T.L.H. v. R.A.R., 2050796,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment, to extent that it granted the father's request to change name of child, had to be dismissed on appeal; relevant statutory section, Ala. Code § 26-11-3(a), stated that it was the probate court that had jurisdiction over name changes of county residents, and, thus, neither the trial court nor a juvenile court had such power.
|
|||||
| Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Bd. v. Parks, 1051376, 1051408,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As water and sewer authority claimed ownership of a disputed parcel through its predecessor's adverse possession, and he held color of title to property containing the parcel during Ala. Code § 6-5-200's 10-year possessory period, trial court should have examined the predecessor's possessory acts on the whole property, not just the disputed parcel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
