 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller & Miller Constr. Co. v. Madewell, 2981452,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In case where employee sought future medical benefits, decision in favor of employee reversed and cause remanded, as trial court applied case law which had been overruled.
|
|||||
| Miller v. State, CR-99-0416,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The judgment denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was reversed and the cause was remanded with directions to transfer the case to the circuit court of original jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Parker v. State, CR-98-2233,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was remanded for imposition of further penalties. Otherwise, the convictions were affirmed because the gas chromatograph test was not novel and did not require an admissibility hearing.
|
|||||
| Sirote & Permutt, P.C. v. Bennett, 1980900,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The time limits in an action for legal malpractice were to be measured from the date of the accrual of the cause of action and not from the date of the occurrence of the act or omission.
|
|||||
| Smelley v. State, CR-98-2427,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of appellant's motion to reinstate a de novo appeal was reversed because it was an abuse of discretion to deny the motion when the court had information that there was good cause for appellant's failure to appear.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CR-98-1554,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's sentence was remanded because his sentence of 12 years was insufficient, as he used a firearm to commit the felony of burglary, which required a minimum sentence of 20 years. Ineffective-assistance claims denied.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. J.W. v. R.D.R., 2990154,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Crediting father with the amount of Social Security death benefits received by child improper because court found no reason to make a distinction between credits against an arrearage and credits against current payments.
|
|||||
| State v. Dunn, CR-98-0061,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Charge against defendant of possession of a pistol after having been convicted of a crime of violence was reinstated, as his theft would have been considered larceny, which was a crime of violence under old the Criminal Code.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Norman, 2981450,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence supported the trial court's determination that it was in the best interests of the children to be placed in the sole legal and physical custody of appellee mother; judgment as to custody was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Vickers v. Dover Elevator Co., 1980208,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 31, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence was presented by plaintiff to create a jury question as to whether defendant bypassed the safety interlock system on a descending elevator thereby causing plaintiff's accident.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
