 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cavalier Mfg. v. Clarke, 1011012, 1011013, 1011014, 1011106,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Differences among respective arbitration provisions in retail installment contract and a separate agreement for arbitration constituted ambiguities that would be construed against mobile home dealers who supplied the forms, under contra proferentem.
|
|||||
| Chance v. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, CR-02-0232,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Mobile v. Robertson, 2020003,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court exceeded its authority by finding that police department policy violated officer's constitutional rights because officer who was suspended for violating policy appealed a personnel board's decision instead of filing a collateral action.
|
|||||
| Clayton v. State, CR-01-2493,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While petitioner's postconviction petition claims were mostly barred because he could have raised them at trial, or he did not raise them in his petition, his claim his attorney did not file appeal he requested required further consideration.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. Higginbotham, 2000563,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Collins v. State, CR-02-0508,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an indictment did not allege that another person aided defendant in a robbery and defendant did not consent to an amendment to the indictment, the trial court erred in denying defendant's postconviction petition.
|
|||||
| Draper v. State, CR-00-2191,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cocaine distribution, trafficking, and tax stamp convictions were all reversed, where despite the lack of a speedy trial violation, prior crimes evidence, though relevant to show identity and motive, was more prejudicial than probative.
|
|||||
| E.W. v. Jefferson County Dep't of Human Res., 2010856,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the context of the individualized service plan meetings that were used to set goals for the mother to regain custody of her child, the mother had no right to counsel, as the meetings were not criminal or adversarial.
|
|||||
| Eason v. Bynon, 2011143,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a judgment was rendered against more than one party and only one of the parties appealed, the judgment against the non-appealing party remained valid, despite a reversal of the judgment as to the appealing party, because no exceptions applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
