 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Orr, 2071186,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 8, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a former employee's action against a former employer to recover worker's compensation benefits for a hip injury based upon a previous injury to her left knee, it was improper to find that she was permanently and totally disabled and to award her benefits because her left-hip injury was not the natural consequence of the injury to her left knee.
|
|||||
| Walding v. Walding, 2080054,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 8, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment was reversed as to the division of property in a divorce proceeding, and the cause was remanded for the trial court to fashion an equitable property division because the division of property was disproportionate.
|
|||||
| William H. Whitehead v. Bradley, 1070987,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 8, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Woodruff v. Woodruff, 2070602,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 8, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment ordering a former husband to pay his ex-wife her share of the net proceeds of the sale of the parties' house was reversed and remanded because, pursuant to the terms of the divorce judgment, the trial court improperly excluded the amount of the mortgage payoff when calculating the net proceeds from the sale of the house.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
