 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Indus. Techs., Inc. v. Jacobs Bank, 1011966, 1012064,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in vacating an award of punitive damages in favor of defendants on a counterclaim against a bank for conversion; there was ample evidence that the bank converted defendants' property knowingly and with legal malice.
|
|||||
| Kimbrell v. White, 2010886,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in denying compensation for a worker's carpal tunnel syndrome; though it had been a preexisting condition, it had not prevented the worker from performing his job in a normal manner.
|
|||||
| King v. State, CR-01-2251,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was entitled to relief where the trial record was unclear as to how many prior felony convictions he had, whether his sentence to life in prison was excessive, and it was necessary to determine if resentencing was warranted.
|
|||||
| King v. State, CR-02-0701,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since petitioner waived his right to seek postconviction relief, because his claim was not jurisdictional, and because it did not involve certain other, limited issues, appeal of summary denial of his postconviction petition had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| King v. State, CR-02-1066,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's motion for a new trial was filed more than 30 days after the trial court pronounced sentence in open court, the motion was untimely and did not toll the time for filing an appeal.
|
|||||
| McNabb v. State, CR-98-0967,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the jury voted on whether to recommend the death penalty, this indicated they unanimously found at least one aggravating circumstance in the two capital murder charges defendant was convicted of beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, CR-02-0453,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court did not err in summarily denying defendant's post-conviction sentencing claim; however, the case was remanded for the circuit court to conduct another sentencing hearing to reconsider the execution of defendant's 20-year sentence.
|
|||||
| Murray v. State, CR-02-0318,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pace v. State, CR-01-1249,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 25, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where motion for new trial was denied by operation of law, but it alleged juror misconduct that could warrant new trial and was supported by evidence that was not presented at trial, appellate court remanded case to trial court for hearing on motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
