 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 2991137,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife not required to prove change of circumstances in support of request for alimony, after trial court reserved the issue. Further, denial of the petition did not foreclose wife's right to seek alimony in the future.
|
|||||
| Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Barnard, 2981082,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctor's state tort claim for golf clubs lost by airline was preempted by federal law. Airline had complied with federal notice requirements regarding limitation of liability and its liability for breach of contract was limited to $ 1,250.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Berryhill, 1992043,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute requiring appointed counsel on appeal in capital cases to have at least five years experience in criminal law practice did not apply to defendant who had received a life sentence rather than death penalty.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Glover, 1000500,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was not entitled to the writ of mandamus because he had another adequate remedy, he could challenge the order through a declaratory judgment action.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Maye, 1991767,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No statute and no rule promulgated by the Alabama Supreme Court prohibited defendants from hiring, at their own expense, a court reporter to record municipal court proceedings to make a record for purposes of appeal.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Moore, 1992080,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother challenging application of child support guidelines did not meet burden of proving that applying them was unjust or inequitable, and because guidelines' presumption was rebutted, modification of child support should have been allowed.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Simmons, 1992270,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Smith, 1992231,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1992269,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 4, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence shampoo substance on petitioner's floor "had been down there sometime" and that pallet-jack tracks were around the shampoo and did not go through it meant that respondent's slip and fall suit was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
