Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Alabama - May 16, 2003
	Horn v. Horn, 2011241, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 16, 2003, Released View this case - free   Overview: Although evidence showed that a mother was struggling financially and that some of her children had special needs, it did not show that the mother was not fit to have custody, and trial court erred by awarding custody to the children's grandparents. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Hunt v. Garcia, 2011102, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 16, 2003, Released View this case - free   Overview: Trial court erred when it computed the amount of child support a husband was required to pay because it did not deduct the amount the husband was paying to support two children he had during a prior marriage when it calculated his gross income. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Preskitt v. Lyons, 1011575, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 16, 2003, Released View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wells v. Mohammad, 2010975, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 16, 2003, Released View this case - free   Overview: An injured party was incorrectly granted a new damages trial because the jury's award was reasonable, based on the evidence, as cross-examination of injured party's witnesses sufficiently questioned reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.