 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Northeast Ala. Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Isbell, 2991186,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where hospital secretary did not present substantial evidence that her latex allergy was a problem peculiar to those employed in secretarial positions, suit seeking compensation for occupational disease could not be maintained.
|
|||||
| Old Republic Sur. Co. v. Auto Auction of Montgomery, Inc., 2991198,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Definition of person under statutory used motor vehicle dealer bond requirement included automobile wholesaler such that it could recover on the bond after wholesaler obtained default judgment against purchaser.
|
|||||
| Price v. McNeil, 2000088,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A dominant estate could not maintain a gate on an easement as long as the servient estate was provided a key to the gate. This arrangement set up by the trial court imposed an unreasonable burden on the servient estate.
|
|||||
| Ryan v. Bartlett, 2000378,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that person might hit or threaten someone was insufficient showing that person posed real and present threat of substantial harm to others, sufficient to deprive the person of his liberty.
|
|||||
| Thedford v. Payne, 2991381,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee's claims should not have been submitted to jury because guest statute precluded recovery on his negligence claim, and substantial evidence did not support his wantonness claim or his negligent entrustment claim.
|
|||||
| W.T.M. v. S.P., 2990593, 2990655, 2990775,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 18, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Correct standard to apply when awarding custody in dispositional phase of dependency proceeding was child's best interest, and demonstration of substantial change in circumstances was not required to change child's custodian.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
