 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dunn v. Dunn, 2020994,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in failing to order a wife to pay child support, given the parties' income differential, but, where the amount of the husband's retirement benefits subject to division was not shown, a split of the benefits was reversed.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Parks, 1030244,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant waived his right to contest the validity of his guilty plea on appeal because he did not request to withdraw his plea or seek other relief from the trial court.
|
|||||
| Giles v. State, CR-00-0376,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court correctly denied defendant's postconviction petition, as the prosecution did not withhold exculpatory evidence and defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel at all stages of his murder trial and at sentencing.
|
|||||
| Glass v. State, CR-03-0136,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's claim of incompetence in a third postconviction petition was different than the issue raised in his first petition, the third petition was not subject to procedural bars.
|
|||||
| Henson v. HealthSouth Med. Ctr., Inc., 1022064,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred when it dismissed a taxpayer's action challenging industrial board's decision granting tax abatement because court's decision precluded taxpayer from showing that board's decision would affect his taxes, giving him standing to sue.
|
|||||
| Horn v. State, CR-02-1938,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to an acquittal on the charge of first-degree criminal mischief, where the State failed to establish that he did not have a right to damage the vehicle at issue or a reasonable ground to believe that he had such a right.
|
|||||
| Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. State, 1011762,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the State's fraud claims against it, where the State failed to establish that it reasonably relied on the alleged fraudulent misrepresentations made against it under a lease agreement.
|
|||||
| Lord v. Lord, 2021071,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order transferring two children from their father's custody was reversed as the mother failed to show that the change would materially promote the children's best interests; the mother failed to provide evidence of drug charges against the father.
|
|||||
| McConico v. Ala. Dep't of Corr., CR-03-0287,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 30, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate failed to show maliciousness or bad faith on the part of the DOC in his custody reclassification; there was no evidence indicating the DOC acted maliciously or in bad faith in reclassifying him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
