Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Alabama - June 15, 2007
  
Russell Petroleum, Inc. v. City of Wetumpka, 1041001, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 15, 2007, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate property owner's duty to pay sales tax, as city had not used administrative procedures of Alabama Taxpayers' Bill of Rights and Uniform Revenue Procedures Act, Ala. Code ? 40-2A-1 et seq., which Alabama Local Tax Simplification Act made applicable to assessment of local sales taxes.

Search Cases for Free
  
Serra Chevrolet, Inc. v. Reylander, 1050278, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Beaird, 1050832, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 15, 2007, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: In a partial taking of realty owned by the landowners, because the trial court did not consider improper valuation evidence as to the landowners' mineral interest in the subject parcel, in violation of Ala. Code ? 18-1A-170, the State was not entitled to a new trial on the issue, and the condemnation award was upheld on appeal.

Search Cases for Free
  
Sullivant v. Sullivan, 1051803, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 15, 2007, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because creditors learned of an administrator's appointment from their attorney after the estate had been closed, the 30-day period in Ala. Code ? 43-2-350(b) was not triggered; thus, since the time for filing a claim against the estate in Ala. Code ?? 43-2-61, 43-2-60 had passed, the creditors' action was properly dismissed as untimely.

Search Cases for Free
  
Traylor v. Traylor, 2060156, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 15, 2007, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Mother's notice of appeal was untimely because parties' joint motion to extend time for a hearing on mother's postjudgment motion did not extend 90-day period for motion to remain pending as provided in Ala. R. Civ. P. 59.1. Mother's motion was denied by operation of law and the 42-day period expired before mother filed her notice of appeal.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.