 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mills v. State, CR-99-0628,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was remanded so appellant could refile as a petition for post conviction relief in the convicting court.
|
|||||
| Montgomery v. State, CR-98-2113,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Murder conviction of appellant who claimed the insanity defense was reversed, because State's lucid-interval jury instruction was not supported by evidence at trial.
|
|||||
| Norwood v. State, CR-99-0839,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appellant's habeas corpus petition was reversed and remanded because such claims were cognizable in a postconviction relief petition regardless of the lack of proper form.
|
|||||
| Oliver v. State, CR-99-0928,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hearsay testimony was admissible in prison disciplinary hearing; however, alone was insufficient to support a finding of guilt. Due process required decision not be arbitrary or capricious and based on some evidence of guilt.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. Patterson, 2981217,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Responsibility for marital debts and home equity were not alimony and were thus discharged in bankruptcy, but materially changed circumstances were not shown to justify modification of alimony or reduction of child support.
|
|||||
| Pearson v. State, CR-98-2503,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's original sentence consisting of concurrent term was reinstated because a recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling allowed concurrent sentencing when certain sentencing enhancement sections applied.
|
|||||
| Rowser v. State, CR-98-2369,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sanders v. Scott, 1981138,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action involving multiple claims submitted to jury, circuit court erroneously instructed jury that plaintiff had to prove every element of complaint for recovery; such prejudicial error entitled plaintiff to new trial.
|
|||||
| Simmons v. State, CR-97-0768,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, April 28, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction for capital murder was affirmed. No error occurred in the admission of DNA evidence, testimony of an agent who believed the offense was sexually motivated, or photographs of the victim's body.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
