 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Russellville Zoning Bd. of Adjustment v. Vernon, 1010331,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning board of adjustment's (ZBA's) decision to deny landowner's application for variance so he could place mobile home on property was not arbitrary even though ZBA had allowed owner to install mobile home on same property three years earlier.
|
|||||
| Drummond Co. v. Bonner, 2010111,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's workers' compensation claim was not barred by doctrine of judicial estoppel where employer had shown no prejudice as result of employee's failure to list workers' compensation claim as a potential asset of bankruptcy estate.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Am. Color Graphics, Inc., 1010180,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In bench trial on employee's claim for permanent disability benefits under Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, trial court erred by admitting reports submitted by three doctors and two psychologists who evaluated employee but did not testify.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Southeast Ala. Med. Ctr., 2001298,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court denied employer's mandamus petition to order circuit court to vacate its order that employer authorize workers' compensation benefits for medically necessary surgery; employee did not have to exhaust utilization review procedures.
|
|||||
| Gov't Emples. Ins. Co. v. Capulli, 2000869,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court affirmed judgment that driver's insurer was to bear its share of driver's passenger's attorney's fee for settlement (that included insurer's subrogation claim) obtained from other driver under equitable common-fund doctrine.
|
|||||
| H.H.B., L.L.C. v. D & F, L.L.C., 1001925, 1002011,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding city council's decision to deny rezoning to be arbitrary and capricious where landowner's application to amend zoning ordinance was fairly debatable. Neighbor had standing to intervene and to appeal judgment.
|
|||||
| ITT Specialty Risk Servs. v. Barr, 1000618,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee showed clear and convincing evidence that, if believed, supported her claim for fraudulent suppression where, inter alia, only the third party administrator knew of its policies, which the employee could not discover elsewhere.
|
|||||
| Jester v. Jester, 2010112,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court failed to follow appellate court's instructions on remand and erred in its calculations of reserve alimony due to wife determining total annual excess taxable income over $ 72,000 rather than calculating each month separately.
|
|||||
| Lacy v. Mini Warehouse World, 1010878,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 24, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The bailee did not prove that its second notice, pursuant to which the sale of the bailor's storage unit's contents was actually conducted, had been mailed to the bailor's home address.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
