 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bowdoin Square, L.L.C. v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc., 1011661,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in limiting a commercial landlord's remedy, where the relevant portion of the lease agreement gave the landlord options to pursue permissive alternatives in the event the tenant defaulted, including abandonment.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Nall, 1012099,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the coaches were discharging their duties in educating a student while conducting a baseball practice session and had not acted wilfully or maliciously, they were entitled to state-agent immunity when the student was injured.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Walter Indus., 1011467, 1020254 and 1020309,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendants demonstrated that the circuit court division where the action was filed was improper, they were entitled to a transfer to the venue in which the act or omission complained of and a substantial part of the claimed events occurred.
|
|||||
| Hammock v. Hammock, 2020115,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court could not declare the wife in contempt for failing to pay mortgage payments on the mobile home awarded to her in a divorce judgment because the mobile home debt was a joint debt, so the parties remained jointly liable for that debt.
|
|||||
| Montgomery v. Hughes Developers, Inc., 1002059,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's denial of relief to a lender, based on the fact that the 50 shares of spurious stock secured a personal debt, was error. However, the lender was not entitled to a transfer of stock representing the over-issue, as such issue was void.
|
|||||
| Ronderos v. Rowell, 1020080,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 6, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Expert's testimony offered by the decedent's administratrix in her malpractice action was properly admitted, as he was a board-certified specialist, on the date of the alleged breach, in a similar discipline or practice to the tortfeasor-doctor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
