 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ala. Disposal Solutions-Landfill v. Town of Lowndesboro, 2000294, 2000324, 2000633,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State environmental agency's adoption of solid-waste plan and related lift of stay of proceedings involving permit meant appeal by it and solid-waste disposal business was moot, and town's ordinance that conflicted with state law was invalid.
|
|||||
| Alaplex Transp., Inc. v. Rossen, 2000826,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order awarding temporary-total-disability and permanent-partial-disability benefits to truck driver was reversed, where lessee, as common carrier, was immune where it entered into contract with owner-operator for the use of its trucks.
|
|||||
| Bowman v. State, CR-01-0797,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: If defendant acted alone, then second-degree robbery was not lesser included offense of first-degree robbery and trial court lacked jurisdiction to accept guilty pleas to second-degree robberies after indictments charged first-degree robberies.
|
|||||
| Burgin v. State, CR-00-1645,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not make specific findings regarding whether the venire was sworn or what the defense and prosecution knew concerning a witness's prior inconsistent statement when the witness was impeached by the State.
|
|||||
| Calloway v. State, CR-01-0771,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Apprendi did not require that enhancements be charged in an indictment, the trial court properly denied defendant's postconviction petition. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to split defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
| Coughlin v. State, CR-00-2610,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Non-indigent defendant was properly allowed to represent himself, despite trial court's failure to apprise him of disadvantages of doing so and that he could withdraw any waiver; appeals court took judicial notice of defendant's legal experience.
|
|||||
| Duke v. State, CR-98-1218,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In capital murder case, trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying change of venue or trying defendant as adult, and it properly ruled on challenges to jury panel, but it did not explain why murders were heinous, atrocious and cruel.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Drummond Co., 1001929,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee failed to present substantial evidence indicating that the effects of the loss of a member extended to other parts of his body and interfered with their efficiency. Occasional swelling did not qualify.
|
|||||
| Ex parte James, 1950030, 1950031, 1950240, 1950241, 1950408, and 1950409,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under state constitutional provision requiring separation of powers, cases challenging the constitutionality of the state's system for financing public education were dismissed, as the legislature was the appropriate forum for the issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
