 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fincher v. State, CR-01-0722,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied claim for post-conviction relief on grounds plea was involuntary, and sentence was illegal, as such was time barred, and nothing in the record supported claims circuit court lacked jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Foster v. State, CR-01-0744,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Apprendi did not require that the enhancements be charged in the indictment. Discussion of credits subsequent to the guilty pea did not make the plea involuntary. The trial court could not split defendant's single sentence.
|
|||||
| Harrison v. State, CR-00-0972,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for murder during a robbery and sentence of death were affirmed as videotapes of defendant's interview with the police and the knife defendant used to kill the victim were admissible into evidence.
|
|||||
| Hollis v. State, CR-01-0060,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cause was remanded to vacate sentencing order where trial court improperly altered defendant's original sentences. Its only sentencing option was to impose that portion of the sentence that had been suspended at the original hearing.
|
|||||
| Key v. State, CR-99-0220,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Considering defendant and the heinousness of the crime he committed, death sentence was neither excessive nor disproportionate, nor was such imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor.
|
|||||
| Madden v. State, CR-00-2498,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mancuso v. State, CR-01-0283,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury was not required to unanimously agree by which method defendant committed third-degree domestic violence, but was required only to unanimously agree that defendant committed one of the predicate offenses listed in the statute.
|
|||||
| Marshall v. State, CR-01-0204,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nothing in the circuit court's order indicated that it ever notified defendant of the dismissal of his first postconviction petition; therefore, defendant was entitled to the relief requested in his second petition.
|
|||||
| Merritt v. State, CR-01-0108,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 31, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
