 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| S.B.L. v. Cleburne County Dep't of Human Res., 2011227,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights were terminated where past history, as well as present circumstances, were considered, and mother's lack of success in raising other children was factor for court to consider. Court's paramount concern was best interests of children.
|
|||||
| Southeast Cancer Network, P.C. v. DCH Healthcare Auth., Inc., 1012382,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 13, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital corporation's exclusive contract with medical professional corporation to provide oncology services was not void, as it did not restrain other physicians in a manner violating statute prohibiting restraint from exercising lawful profession.
|
|||||
| T.T.W. v. V.A., 2011174,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 13, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Best interests of the child were served where the child was placed in the custody of his mother, due to her work schedule, her ability to provide for health care, and the child's interaction in social and family activities while with her.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, 1020014,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 13, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the State's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence met the first two elements of a Brady violation, the trial court's ruling allowing hearsay and extensive cross-examination of a police detective eliminated any resulting prejudice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
