 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clark v. State, CR-99-1062,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The procedure by which defendant was sentenced to death fully complied with the Ring decision of the United States Supreme Court; the jury's guilt-phase verdict alone exposed defendant to a range of punishment that included the death penalty.
|
|||||
| Cockrell v. State, CR-01-2097,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by denying defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal, as there was no evidence that defendant intended to murder the victim; rather, there was only evidence that defendant intended to murder another individual.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. State, CR-01-2205,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant who was charged with reckless murder for allegedly causing death of another motorist in a vehicle accident was entitled to have jury charged on vehicular homicide, and trial court erred by refusing defendant's request for that instruction.
|
|||||
| D.K.T. v. State, CR-02-1130,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the evidence supported two charges of third-degree theft, rather than one second-degree charge and one third-degree charge, the matter was remanded for resentencing; the issue of intent was not preserved for appellate review.
|
|||||
| Ex parte 84 West, Inc., 1020895,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Creech, 1020055,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Fort James Operating Co., 1020678,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A writ of certiorari was quashed as improvidently granted because an employer seeking review of certain attorney fee calculations lacked standing to seek the writ where the court of appeals had granted it the relief it sought.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Kelley, 1012018,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reputed drug dealer's apparent drug sale to a man, his furtive transfer of an item to defendant, and her concealment of the item, in a club that was the subject of complaints of drug sales, gave officer probable cause to stop and search defendant.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Key, 1011682,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judicial abrogation of year-and-a-day rule was improper, and in camera review of a witness's prior statement was wrongly declined, but admitting cumulative grand jury testimony was harmless, and victim's hospital records were statutorily admissible.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
