 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kabat v. State, CR-01-1076,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regardless of the illegality of defendant's first statement, the evidence of the victim's body and the crime scene was admissible under the inevitable-discovery exception and the independent-source exception to the exclusionary rule.
|
|||||
| Kaiser v. Kaiser, 2010287,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in awarding wife portion of husband's retirement accounts, as parties had not been married for 10 years when wife filed her divorce complaint. It was not abuse of discretion to award primary physical custody of children to husband.
|
|||||
| Lee v. State, CR-00-0084,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's capital murder and attempted murder convictions and his capital sentence were affirmed as the trial court did not err in the conduct of the voir dire or the trial, and the sentence was appropriate.
|
|||||
| Matchum v. State, CR-02-0379,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for possession of a pistol after a conviction of a crime of violence was properly enhanced under the Alabama Habitual Offenders Act.
|
|||||
| Med. Licensure Comm'n v. Almeida, 2011096,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Miller v. Miller, 2010967,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding divorcing parties' 18-year-old son, a college student who worked 30-35 hours per week, was emancipated, as he lived with his mother and did not pay either parent for his room, board, clothing, vehicle, or gasoline.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, CR-02-0453,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a trial court omitted a five-year enhancement when reconsidering defendant's sentence, the court exceeded its jurisdiction because the sentence was valid and the court was only to change its execution.
|
|||||
| N.L.H. v. State, CR-02-0877,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant did not preserve the weight of the evidence claim for appellate review; although insufficient to find second-degree criminal mischief, the evidence was sufficient to find that defendant committed third-degree criminal mischief.
|
|||||
| Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Rhodes, 1020160,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 27, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the term "regularly lives in your household" was not ambiguous, the court incorrectly found ambiguity in contract language and incorrectly entered a summary judgment for an insured. Summary judgment for the insurer was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
