 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AmSouth Bank v. Tice, 1031391,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 1, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where auto dealer sued his bank for wrongful dishonor of checks and wrongful payment of stale-dated checks, in violation of, respectively, Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 674.402 and 674.404 (1993) of Florida's UCC, he could not also assert claims of negligence and wantonness as these common-law claims had been preempted by those statutes.
|
|||||
| Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1030470,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 1, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an individual's negligence counterclaim was actually seeking damages for negligent prosecution of a civil case, the action was not cognizable in Alabama; therefore, the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the insured.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
