 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carpenter v. Tillman, 1030694,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 7, 2006, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ala. Code § 14-6-81 vested state corrections department with very broad discretion as to inspections of county jails; since nothing in federal trial court's certified question suggested failure to inspect was anything but exercise of that discretion, neither corrections department nor department employees could be held liable for detainee's death.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Addiction & Mental Health Servs., 1041820,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 7, 2006, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which patient claimed health services company breached its duty to him by divulging to third parties confidential information regarding his treatment, because company failed to establish a legal right to have the case transferred to another court pursuant to Ala. Code § 6-5-546, its motion for change of venue was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Coffey v. Moore, 1031268,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A bailee of a rented vehicle was not a guest of a friend while riding in the vehicle for purposes of Alabama's guest statute, Ala. Code § 32-1-2; the friend's classification as a guest under the guest statute was determined at the inception of the journey, and the simple act of changing drivers did nothing to affect or alter this classification.
|
|||||
| Ex parte City of Greensboro, 1031591,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 14, 2006, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a court clerk clearly performed a judicial function by making certain decisions and undertaking specific actions to ensure that the arrest warrants were recalled, the clerk and the city were entitled to absolute judicial immunity and a writ of mandamus directing the entry of summary judgment in their favor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
