 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sloan v. State, CR-99-0830,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court in Limestone County did not have authority to dispose of habeas corpus petition, and case needed to be remanded for transfer to trial court with authority to make determination, namely the court in Morgan County.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CR-98-0206,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was more than sufficient evidence presented for trial court to find that the murder committed by appellant was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel as compared to other capital murders.
|
|||||
| Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. Gary, 1972290,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyer's claims against manufacturer were subject to arbitration because claims against seller were subject to arbitration, and claims related primarily to manufacturer's conduct as to which seller was alleged to be a coconspirator.
|
|||||
| Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. Kennedy, 1980365,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant manufacturer could not compel plaintiffs to arbitrate claims against it based on arbitration agreement with defendant dealer to which it was a nonsignatory.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Pryor v. Cupps, 2990199,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by ending trial before state agency had the opportunity to present the witnesses it claimed would have proved the allegations of its complaint.
|
|||||
| State v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., CR-98-0565,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant insurance corporation could not have been charged with perjury in connection with a malpractice suit because the perjury statutes did not specifically impose criminal liability on corporations.
|
|||||
| Sweeney v. State, CR-99-0632,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 2970767,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vinson v. State, CR-98-1980,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, May 26, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were reversed because the search of the satchel was illegal and did not fall within any of the exceptions to the warrant requirement, and appellant's statements were fruit of the poisonous tree.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
