 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carr v. Added Dimensions No. 72 Brookwood, 2990263,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's judgment as a matter of law, regardless whether made pursuant to a motion referring to a jury trial or not, had to substantially comply with a requirement for sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law.
|
|||||
| Ebsco Indus. v. Royal Ins. Co. of Am., 1980854,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insured was covered under insurance policy issued by insurer due to insurer's unilateral mistake in not removing insured's name from former parent corporation's policy.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Birmingham News, Inc., 1981445,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Newspaper was not liable for invasion of privacy concerning employee's claim that it released information concerning her sexual harassment claim where it did not publicize, but merely investigated the claim.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 1980260,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer had a qualified privilege against dentist's defamation claim for letters to patients denying payment for procedures it claimed were outside scope of dentist's license, because letters were within its duty to patients.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Ingram, 1981165,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecution of ex-husband in family court under criminal non-support statute improper where no children were born during marriage and wife was not dependent spouse. Enforcement of alimony obligations was matter for trial court.
|
|||||
| Ex parte National Sec. Ins. Co., 1971861,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's application for writ of mandamus ordering circuit court to vacate discovery orders denied; because respondent alleged fraud and sought punitive damages, respondent was entitled to broader discovery than generally allowed.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Yost, 1981976,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though trial court properly denied periodic alimony payments to wife and did not err in dividing parties' marital property, it abused its discretion when it failed to reserve right to award periodic alimony upon future consideration.
|
|||||
| Flagstar Enters., Inc. v. Howard, 1971881,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lowrey v. McNeel, 1972260 and 1972261,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 9, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trust administration dispute in which appellants argued that family trustee should have continued to serve as trustee and appellees argued that bank trustee was appropriate, there was no error in appointing bank trustee.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
