 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Drummond, 1990033,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Division of property and spousal support award reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the trial court's judgment because it did not plainly or palpably abuse its discretion in dividing the property or in awarding spousal support.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Jordan, 1990206,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After the trial court had denied the motion to reinstate its dismissal for failure to file a certificate of readiness, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to reconsider, which was a successive postjudgment motion.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Master Boat Builders, Inc., 1991229 and 1991245,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of mandamus issued directing the trial court to set aside its order denying copartners' motions to strike partner's jury demand as to all claims arising out of partnership business until there was a final accounting.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 1981856,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of defendants was reinstated because the statutes of limitations were not tolled and plaintiffs' claims for fraud, deceit, conversion, and misrepresentation were time-barred.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Sneed, 1981660,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Ward, 1990727,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife lived in the same house with a man for 12 years, they had sexual relations, and wife cohabitated with him. Thus, husband was not liable for any alimony after the date wife began cohabitating with her boyfriend.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Wills, 1982272,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hoffman v. Truck Driving Academy, Inc., 2990591,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court should not have dismissed plaintiff's claims against defendants on basis of judicial estoppel where defendants did not show prejudice arising from plaintiff's failure to disclose claims in bankruptcy petition.
|
|||||
| Investors Guar. Fund v. Compass Bank, 1981386,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because foreign company contracted to insure bonds issued in Alabama, state had in personam jurisdiction over company, and properly entered default judgment against it for failure to answer complaint or otherwise respond to suit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
