 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Big Valley Home Ctr., Inc. v. Mullican, 1982039,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court correctly denied defendant's motion to compel arbitration; defendant had waived its right by substantially invoking the litigation process and substantially prejudicing the plaintiff in doing so.
|
|||||
| City of Spanish Fort v. City of Daphne, 1982114,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dispute between two cities over annexation of property, local act authorizing purported annexation was unconstitutional, and annexation of causeway properties was invalid due to lack of contiguity.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. State, CR-99-1208,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An indigent appellant was entitled to counsel for the appeal of revocation of his probation if he had a colorable claim that he had not violated his probation or if there were reasons to mitigate the violation, and the reasons were complex.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Anderson, 1981846,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former class members lacked standing to object to class action settlement, because they were not constrained by terms of settlement and remained in same position with respect to defendant as before settlement was made.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Cranman, 1971903,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State university-employed doctors who misdiagnosed student were not personally immune from civil liability in that their treatment of student did not fit into any categories of immune conduct recognized by the court's restated rule of immunity.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Ingram, 1982167,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit alleging fraud against insurance company, trial court correctly limited award of punitive damages; thus petition for writ of mandamus was premature. Petition was granted as it related to limitation of discovery.
|
|||||
| Ex parte J.J.D., 1982065,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Discovery of defendant probationer in the company of someone with a criminal record was insufficient by itself to support a finding that the defendant violated the terms of his probation.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Jackson, 1982051,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical malpractice action did not fall within exception to rule that writ of mandamus will not issue to review merits of order denying a motion for summary judgment. Another adequate remedy (an appeal) was available to petitioners.
|
|||||
| Ex parte M.V.S., 1991280,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 16, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
