 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Daniel v. Daniel, 2001270,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By using the standard of review for cases when a nonparent sought to overcome the superior right of a parent to custody of a child, the trial court applied the wrong standard since the parents had been awarded joint custody.
|
|||||
| Daniel v. Daniel, 2001266,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court could require that children's noncovered medical expenses be split evenly. Alimony awarded was a hybrid of both periodic alimony and alimony in gross. Appellate court reversed and remanded for clarification on this issue.
|
|||||
| Fomby v. Fomby, 2010508,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The record did not contain all the required child-support guideline forms and the trial court's basis for determining the father's child-support obligation was unclear.
|
|||||
| G.P. v. A.A.K., 2000496,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in declining to enforce or modify foreign judgment granting grandparents visitation with their grandchild, as disposition did not turn on constitutionality of statute. Full faith and credit to said judgment was priority.
|
|||||
| Goodwin v. Calfee, 2010265,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hollen v. Conley, 2010002,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the son showed an aptitude for technical training in welding, the denial of postminority support was erroneous; the judgment for arrearages could not include compound interest but could award credits against arrearages.
|
|||||
| McClelland v. McClelland, 2001125,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying wife pendente lite support, where husband conceded that such was unpaid, and she testified such was reduced to a sum certain. Custody award, property division, and denial of wife's attorney fees were upheld.
|
|||||
| Tabor v. Buxton, 2000191,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Reynolds, 2010211,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 19, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's finding of the employee's 80 percent permanent partial disability both before and after remand directing the trial court not to consider evidence of vocational disability was not supported by the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
