 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Miller, 1980529, 1980530,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because appellee's claims involved the insurance business of appellant insurer, they fell under the insurance exception of the securities dealer association code of arbitration, and were specifically excepted from arbitration.
|
|||||
| Connell v. Parish, 2990062,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A judgment of divorce between husband and wife was not final when the husband committed suicide less than 30 days from the date of filing the summons and complaint; therefore his death abated the divorce action.
|
|||||
| Drummond Co. v. Lolley, 2990131,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent's widow was entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits where decedent died from a cause unrelated to his work injury and where the benefit amount to which he was entitled had been established prior to his demise.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Ferguson, CR-99-1680,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas petition granted in part; circuit court directed to state reasons for denying habeas corpus relief and state findings of fact as to why bail was fixed at an amount substantially higher than recommended amount in bail schedule.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Hammonds, 1990258,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Capital murder and death sentence affirmed; no error found in guilt phase or sentencing phase. The evidence supported the trial court's findings and the death sentence was appropriate under the circumstances.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Handley, 1990420,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance company waited 18 months to compel arbitration, engaged in discovery, and filed third-party indemnity action and thus substantially invoked the litigation process and waived its right to arbitrate insured's claims.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Howle, 1982205,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When spouse raised the issue of alleged battery in divorce and accepted payment of medical expenses related to alleged battery, ex-husband was entitled to summary judgment on assault-and-battery claim on res judicata grounds.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Ingram, 1990282,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court imposed a death sentence as aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating. Appellant's sentence was not influenced by passion or other arbitrary factors and it was not excessive. Thus, death sentence was appropriate.
|
|||||
| Ex parte James, 1980820,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver from whose car people ran away when approached by police, and who calmly drove away, had the right to ignore police such that his stop was unconstitutional; as was police discovery of a drug in a pocket of his that had not been patted down.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Usrey, 1961859,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 23, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's evidence created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether employer's stated reason for terminating employee was merely a pretext for discharge in retaliation for employee filing workers' compensation claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
