 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Scheer Homes, Inc. v. Hills, 2070217,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as under caveat emptor, seller was not obligated to disclose to buyer that utility company had decided to build power station on parcel south of Property. Contract only required disclosure of pending public improvements, repairs, replacements, or alterations to Property, which did not include parcel to south of Property.
|
|||||
| Stout v. Cumse, 2070283,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as passengers could possibly prevail on negligence claim against driver since complaint alleged that passengers were injured while they were being transported while in county sheriff's department's custody, and that driver was driving. It was unclear if driver was deputy sheriff entitled to Ala. Const. art. I, § 14 immunity.
|
|||||
| Waterworks & Sewer Bd. of Selma v. Allen, 1061648,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board's declaratory judgment action should not have been dismissed, as the Board's complaint alleged a justiciable controversy about which of the claimants to same directorship on the Board should be seated, and both claimants were named as parties to the action; a declaratory judgment action was the proper vehicle for resolving such a dispute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
