 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Cummings, 19814281,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner granted writ of mandamus ordering vacation of order denying motion to compel production of workers' compensation files held by respondents, as respondents failed to prove files covered by work product or attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Flynn, 1981999,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even if nurse's decisions when implementing treatment orders required her to exercise judgment, such decisions did not fall into established category of discretionary decisions for which state agent would have been immune from civil liability.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Hitt, 1980253,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The 30-day jurisdictional period during which the trial court could amend petitioner's DUI sentence on its own motion was not tolled by the pendency of petitioner's new trial motion.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Howlet, 1981736,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order extending deadline for deciding motion for new trial to a date 14 days after completion and delivery of the trial transcript satisfied criminal procedural rule requiring decision to be continued to a date certain.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 1981532,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In order to avoid appearance of impropriety, judge who had disqualified himself had no power to transfer cases to another judge, and orders entered by second judge were vacated.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Kraatz, 1980219,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Whether poor lighting led to plaintiff's fall and injuries was a question for the trier of fact. Thus, trial court improperly granted defendant's summary judgment motion and appellate court improperly affirmed that judgment.
|
|||||
| Ex parte LifeUSA Ins. Co., 1981504,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte M.T.S., 1981057,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where inspector's logbook indicated that intoxilyzer passed inspection but also that results of one of two required tests fell outside acceptable range of deviation, admission of results of defendant's blood-alcohol test was error.
|
|||||
| Ex parte McNeil, 1981873,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, June 30, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Default judgment on promissory note against defendant based on service by publication was void where statute and case law expressly held that service by publication was not allowed in cases on promissory notes.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
