 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| C.H. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 2010474,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in terminating the mother's and the father's parental rights to the children, because of the evidence of the parent's drug use and neglect and abuse of their children.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. Naman's Catering, Inc., 1011207,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because former employee failed to prove damages on his claim for conversion and for his former employer's failure to pay insurance premiums, summary judgment was proper. Remand was ordered on fraud and interest claim on Christmas account.
|
|||||
| D.S.M. v. L.M., 2010021,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The five-year statute of limitations did not apply because the action was one to establish the nonexistence--rather than the existence--of the father and child relationship between the husband and the child.
|
|||||
| Dexter v. State, 2010895,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of a prisoner's habeas corpus petition alleging he no longer met the requirements for civil commitment was affirmed; the appellate brief contained no citations to legal authority and gave the appellate court nothing to review.
|
|||||
| Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, 2010101,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two sons failed to show that equity justified overlooking their father's non-delivery of stock shares to one son in a purported reconveyance; the father's statements in a divorce proceeding did not cause judicial estoppel.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Dixon, 2010269,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A supervisor of county welfare programs was on notice of the income requirements applicable to a program of which her own mother took advantage, and was properly fired for failure to include her own salary in family income.
|
|||||
| Hornady Truck Line, Inc. v. Meadows, 1010955, 1010956, 1011005, 1011006,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Due to unsafe speed of both a passing truck and the encroached vehicle, wet road conditions, and hydroplaning vehicle, jury properly found negligence and wantonness on their part. Damages award was also not excessive, due to extent of injuries.
|
|||||
| In re Adoption of J.C.P., 2010594,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The adoption notice was not ambiguous; a hearing on the putative father's motion contesting the adoption of the child was unnecessary because the motion was untimely and because the putative father's consent was not required.
|
|||||
| Marsh v. Marsh, 2001031,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 16, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother's and father's appeals following the trial court's denial of their post-judgment motions regarding the modification of the father's child support obligations were dismissed as untimely filed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
