 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Drummond Co. v. Johnson, 2020121,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by synthesizing the conflicting medical testimony as to whether the worker had occupational pneumoconiosis and reaching its own conclusion that the worker had the disease.
|
|||||
| Ex parte State Dep't of Revenue, 2011280,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in striking the names of a partnership, or the respective partners individually, where a lis pendens claim by the Department of Revenue was filed to protect its tax lien. Thus, the Department was not entitled to mandamus.
|
|||||
| McCurdy v. McCurdy, 2020336,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| R.L.W. v. C.L.W., 2020156,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though the trial court reduced a husband's monthly alimony payment because of the husband's changed circumstances, the modified monthly payment award that was set crippled the husband financially and had to be reversed.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, 1021238,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. A.R.C., CR-02-1359,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's petition for a writ of mandamus to review a trial court's ruling barring admission of certain statements was denied; State could have sought pretrial ruling on admissibility of statements and mandamus was not a substitute for an appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
