Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Alabama - August 15, 2003
  
Drummond Co. v. Johnson, 2020121, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err by synthesizing the conflicting medical testimony as to whether the worker had occupational pneumoconiosis and reaching its own conclusion that the worker had the disease.

Search Cases for Free
  
Ex parte Austin Apparel, Inc., 1021341, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Ex parte State Dep't of Revenue, 2011280, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in striking the names of a partnership, or the respective partners individually, where a lis pendens claim by the Department of Revenue was filed to protect its tax lien. Thus, the Department was not entitled to mandamus.

Search Cases for Free
  
McCurdy v. McCurdy, 2020336, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
R.L.W. v. C.L.W., 2020156, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Even though the trial court reduced a husband's monthly alimony payment because of the husband's changed circumstances, the modified monthly payment award that was set crippled the husband financially and had to be reversed.

Search Cases for Free
  
Smith v. State, 1021238, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. A.R.C., CR-02-1359, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 15, 2003, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: State's petition for a writ of mandamus to review a trial court's ruling barring admission of certain statements was denied; State could have sought pretrial ruling on admissibility of statements and mandamus was not a substitute for an appeal.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.