 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Kendrick, 1981938,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 13, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's claim of fraud was barred by statute of limitations as he waited five years to bring action against defendant even though he actually knew of the facts that would have put a reasonable person on notice of fraud.
|
|||||
| Purcell v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co., 2000015,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, July 13, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insured had not exercised reasonable diligence in investigating whether the vehicle or the driver that hit him were uninsured, thus insurance company was entitled to summary judgment in suit to recover uninsured motorist benefits.
|
|||||
| Sieber v. Campbell, 1991706,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 13, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a corporate officer, a resident of Canada, located his employee in Alabama to do corporate business, the Alabama court properly exercised personal jurisdiction over the officer in the employee's suit for breach of an employment contract.
|
|||||
| Wesson v. McCleave, Roberts, Shields, & Green, P.C., 1991210,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, July 13, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client's suit for legal malpractice against his attorney was time barred since it was not commenced within two years of the date when the attorney failed to file an age-discrimination suit within the allotted time for filing the discrimination suit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
