|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Alabama - September 14, 2007
|
| |
Vintage Pharms., LLC v. Hayes, 2060284,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because, in order to receive compensation outside the schedule, an injured worker had to show that his injury to a scheduled member extended to a nonscheduled part of his body and interfered with its efficiency, and he did not do so, the trial court erred by not treating the injury as a scheduled injury pursuant to Ala. Code ¿ 25-5-57(a)(3).
|
|
| |
Ward v. Check Into Cash Ala., LLC, 2060820,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Order compelling arbitration of workers' compensation claim was error because, although parties' contract provided for arbitration, terms of Workers' Compensation Act (Act), Ala. Code ¿ 25-5-1 et seq., were implied in every employment contract, creating ambiguity. Specific agreement under the Act prevailed over more general arbitration clause.
|
|
| |
Willis v. Kincaid, 1061154, 1061184,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a declaratory judgment action, a trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a mayor and voiding a city council resolution approving a salary increase, which the mayor vetoed, because the applicable mayor-council act qualified the mayor's authority over the salaries for employees covered by the Civil Service Act, 1977 Ala. Acts 684, ¿ 4.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|