 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lanier v. State, CR-01-0958,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no indication that defendant was apprised of his right to be represented by counsel at the probation-revocation hearing or that the trial court made an initial determination of whether defendant was entitled to counsel.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. Conseco Fin. Corp., 1010772, 1010752,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of an arbitration provision in an installment agreement, the buyers of a mobile home had to resolve their dispute with the seller and the finance company in arbitration, as the transaction had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
|
|||||
| Lykes v. State, CR-01-0974,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| MacEwan v. State, CR-99-0463,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mercy Med. v. Gray, 2010198,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court did not support its findings for remittitur, it correctly determined that collateral estoppel did not apply and that the employer's stated reasons for the employee's termination were pretextual.
|
|||||
| Moffitt v. State, CR-00-0574,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| N. Montgomery Materials v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2010154,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the landscaper and the insurer, where there was substantial evidence of a genuine issue of material fact as to the elements of the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel.
|
|||||
| Russ v. State, CR-00-2592,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A remand of the dismissal of defendant's petition for postconviction relief was required to determine when or if defendant received an order denying an earlier petition in order to determine if defendant was entitled to an out-of-time appeal.
|
|||||
| Russell v. City of Mobile, CR-00-1160,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 30, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
