 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ala. State Bd. of Pharm. v. Holmes, 2030949,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 23, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a pharmacist improperly dispensed large amounts of controlled substances and otherwise engaged in illegal and irresponsible conduct, the state pharmacy board acted within its discretion, under Ala. Code § 34-23-92(12), in revoking his license and imposing a substantial fine, and this penalty did not have to be similar to that in other cases.
|
|||||
| Leithead v. Banyan Corp., 1040688,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 23, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a corporation maintained general contacts with State of Alabama, purposefully availed itself of the privilege of doing business therein, and defending a lawsuit within did not impose a significant financial burden upon it, its president's breach of contract and negligence action was wrongfully dismissed on personal jurisdiction grounds.
|
|||||
| Westwind Techs., Inc. v. Jones, 1040101,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 23, 2005, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in granting a former employee's motion to dismiss, pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), an action by his former employer, alleging breach of a noncompetition agreement, as the trial court should not have considered allegations made by the former employee outside the pleadings, nor could judicial notice be taken of those facts.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
