 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Billy Barnes Enters. v. Williams, 1050183,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury suit, as defendant reasonably relied on plaintiffs false claim that he had made no recorded statements about accident to anyone, and defendant was damaged by this reliance, as it would not have settled had it known of plaintiff's recorded statement, parties' settlement agreement should have been set aside on grounds of fraud.
|
|||||
| Burruss v. State, CR-06-0124,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Collins v. Ala. Dep't of Corr., 1061637,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate appealed the denial of his certiorari petition challenging DOC's classification of him. As Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals' jurisdiction was not limited to appeals in cases where certiorari petitions challenged DOC actions involving conduct of inmates while they were incarcerated, it erred in transferring appeal to court of civil appeals.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, CR-06-0850,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court needed to determine whether the same act of robbery formed the basis for both defendant's felony-murder conviction and his first-degree robbery conviction, as double jeopardy principles might be implicated, and, thus, defendant's case had to be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Montgomery County Dep't of Human Res., 2060672,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Montgomery County Dep't of Human Res. v. Howard, 2060668,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte State, 1061120,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Young, 1061272,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Floyd v. State, CR-05-0935,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 28, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
