LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - September 15, 2006

  
Allied Prods. Corp. v. Thomas, 2040458, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: It was error for the trial court to deny a motion for relief from default judgment entered in favor of a workers' compensation claimant, pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 60(b), because the claimant had not effected proper service on the corporation as required by former Ala. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(6). Service at a successor entity was not effective service.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Higgins, 1051279, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Verbena United Methodist Church, 1050952, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of motion to transfer venue to Chilton County, pursuant to Ala. Code § 6-3-21.1(a) of a member's defamation case against a church was error because evidence before trial court showed, inter alia, that 13 of the 15 members of the church's administrative council, as well as a majority of church's congregation, resided in Chilton County.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gallups v. Kent, 1050034, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's decision finding that plaintiff had an ownership interest in the property at issue, coming from the wife's original interest in the property conveyed by deed in 1929, was affirmed because a subsequent correction deed filed in 1933 was ineffective to invalidate the wife's one-half interest in the property.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hanner v. Metro Bank, 1041966, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment granted on a declaratory judgment action and on the guardian's claims for conversion and bad faith was reversed because there were issues concerning whether or not the assignee bank had notice that the insurance policy was kept for the minor son pursuant to an earlier decree when it took the assignment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
James v. Brewster, 2050297, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A matter was remanded to the trial court for redetermination of the boundary line between two properties because it was error to rely on a survey that had attempted to establish a compromise of the dispute. Use of a driveway by defendant was through a license that could be revoked and not an easement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kendrick v. Kendrick, 2050156, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action to quiet title, plaintiffs had presented sufficient evidence to support a finding that their use of the property at issue for approximately 30 years met the requirements of adverse possession and it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment to defendant. Factual issues remained on the question of permissive use.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.