 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brannan v. Smith, 1991186,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for quo warranto against probate judge, who ordered an town incorporation election, was properly denied because judge was not a party to the action where he did not unlawfully hold office.
|
|||||
| Capitol Chevrolet & Imports, Inc. v. Grantham, 1990404,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motor vehicle purchaser and spouse were required to submit claims alleging vehicle defects and resulting injuries to arbitration, as specified in purchase agreement, and spouse could not avoid arbitration by alleging she was not party to contract.
|
|||||
| Cole v. Farmers Exch. Bank, 2980578,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Colonial Bank v. Patterson, 1990237 and 1990293,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the intentional interference with business relations claim, because it was a party to the business relationship, and its conduct was proper under the contract.
|
|||||
| Ex parte A.B., 1981958,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because contract was void for lack of mutuality, no contract or assignment of that contract existed; therefore specific performance was precluded.
|
|||||
| Ex parte C.V., 1981316,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in terminating a father's parental rights since he owed no duty to support his child until his parental rights were established and he learned the true identity of prospective adoptive parents.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Friedman's Inc., 1990979,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a statutory pronouncement was clear, it was the paramount judicial duty of a court to abide by that clear pronouncement. The trial court erred by failing to conduct the statutorily required discovery-scheduling conference.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Kirby Co., 1991134,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge erred when he attempted to select his successor judge in a case in which he was disqualified and the case was remanded with instructions to follow proper procedure for the reassignment of a judge.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Lucas, 1990112,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 17, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying judgment of acquittal from capital murder conviction where State failed to prove essential element of causation that appellant's injured son would have survived but for failure to seek prompt medical treatment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
