 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amaro v. Amaro, 2010429,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in imputing income to father for child support purposes, ordering arrearage, finding father in contempt, or ordering attorney fee, but evidence was insufficient for postminority education support and health insurance orders.
|
|||||
| Bd. of Control of the Emples. Ret. Sys. v. Hadden, 2010259,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appointed supernumerary sheriff was not entitled to reimbursement of his suspended retirement allowance, as he was serving as an appointed official and had been restored to active service.
|
|||||
| Cmty. Care of Am. of Ala. v. Davis, 1010454,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nursing home, which lost its certificate to transact business, could not enforce an arbitration provision with a resident because the dispute arose out of a localized activity, an intrastate labor-intensive transaction between the parties.
|
|||||
| Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., 1010849,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the injured party had tripped over some bags set on the floor by the store, the store did not establish the injured party was aware of, or should have been aware of, the dangerous condition. Summary judgment was inappropriate.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Lamar Adver. Co., 1010479,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The lower courts erred in affirming a decision by a zoning board, since addition of a motor to a sign enabling the sign to display numerous advertisements did not enlarge or expand the sign's nonconforming use.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Pikeville Country Club, 1011244,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying defendants' motions to transfer the case to Marion County, where event giving rise to subcontractor's claim, mailing of letter containing alleged misrepresentations, occurred in Marion County, where letter was mailed.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Seaman Timber Co., 1001658,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion in dismissing only the personal injury portion of respondents' complaint after their intentional obstruction of discovery, including the refusal to permit petitioners to depose a now deceased respondent.
|
|||||
| Gonzalez, LLC v. DiVincenti, 1010015, 1011011,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After the owner of a damaged roof settled and dismissed his lawsuit against his insurers and brokers, the owner's claim for damages against the inspector of the roof hired by the insurers and brokers was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
|
|||||
| Hylton v. Meztista, 2990405,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 13, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
